Airfares on routes to UP, Bihar, and Bengal have surged up to 185% for Holi weekend; here's the data, the economics, and what the Supreme Court is doing about it.
Team Sahi
Imagine booking a flight from Delhi to Gorakhpur for ₹8,563 and then watching the exact same ticket drop to ₹2,999 a month later. That’s not a glitch. That’s Holi flight prices in 2026, and it’s playing out on routes across India right now.
With Holi falling on March 4 this year, millions of people are trying to get home to UP, Bihar, Bengal, and Jharkhand for one of India’s biggest festivals. Train tickets? Sold out weeks ago. Premium services like Rajdhani and Duronto are showing “REGRET” status, meaning not just the seats but even the waiting lists are closed. Buses are filling up fast, with some operators charging ₹3,000 for a 30-hour backbreaker ride. That leaves flights, and airlines know it.
The result? Airfares on key Holi routes have surged as high as 185% compared to prices just four weeks later. And the Supreme Court has had enough.
Let’s not bury the data. Here’s what a one-way flight actually costs on February 28 compared to what it costs on March 28, the same airline, the same route, a month apart.
| Route | Feb 28 Fare | Mar 28 Fare | Surge |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Delhi – Gorakhpur | ₹8,563 | ₹2,999 | +185% |
| New Delhi – Gaya | ₹11,720 | ₹4,499 | +160% |
| Bengaluru – Gorakhpur | ₹19,589 | ~₹7,592 | ~158% |
| Mumbai – Prayagraj | ₹16,188 | ₹6,588 | +146% |
| New Delhi – Patna | ₹11,056 | ₹4,502 | +145% |
| Bengaluru – Patna | ₹15,585 | ₹7,500 | ~108% |
| New Delhi – Kolkata | ₹9,989 | ₹4,799 | ~108% |
| Bengaluru – Kolkata | ₹12,412 | ₹6,660 | ~86% |
Source: IndiaToday. Note: Current prices can be different.
A family of four flying from Delhi to Patna on February 28 is looking at ₹44,224 one way for what would otherwise be a ₹18,008 trip in the normal season. That’s ₹26,000 extra, gone, just for choosing to travel when the algorithm says demand is highest.
Dynamic pricing isn’t new, and it isn’t unique to Indian airlines. Airlines globally, from Southwest to Singapore Airlines, use yield management algorithms that adjust prices in real time based on seat availability, time to departure, competing bookings, and historical demand patterns.
Think of it like the bid-ask spread on a stock. The more buyers chase a limited supply, the higher the price gets. Early buyers (those who booked in October) got the “ask” at the bottom of the book. Late buyers, the ones scrambling for tickets a week before Holi, are the ones hitting market orders at peak prices.
The difference with stocks? In a stock market, you can choose not to buy. When your only alternative is a 30-hour bus ride or no trip at all, you’re not really making a free choice. You’re just paying whatever the algorithm charges.
There’s another layer here too. Airlines price their cabins in fare buckets. Think of a flight with 180 seats as having 8–10 price “tranches.” The cheapest 10–15 seats go first, then the next tranche kicks in at a higher price, and so on. By the time you’re searching two weeks out on a high-demand date, you’re buying from the very top of the bucket, which is why the same seat is five times more expensive than the one your colleague bought three months ago.
The airfare surge isn’t just a festival demand story. It’s the symptom of a sector with structural cracks running deep.
IndiGo alone holds approximately 62% of the domestic market as of February 2026. Add Air India, and the two carriers together command roughly 90% of domestic passenger traffic. When one dominant carrier sets fares high on a route, the other has little incentive to undercut, a pattern regulators globally recognize as parallel pricing.
India’s two biggest airports — Delhi and Mumbai, are operating near their physical limits. There is no simple lever to “add flights” on short notice because slots are already constrained. When demand surges, supply can’t respond.
India operates a fleet of over 840 aircraft for 350 million+ annual passengers (a figure projected to reach 715 million by 2030). The sector needs an estimated 7,000 new pilots just between 2024 and 2026, against a backdrop of training bottlenecks, limited simulator availability, and instructor shortages. The global benchmark is 18–20 pilots per narrow-body aircraft; India is at 14–16. Fewer pilots means fewer flights, which means fewer seats, which means higher prices when demand spikes.
India deliberately deregulated airline pricing following the collapse of Air Deccan and Jet Airways, where fare wars had made the business unviable. The government’s current position, stated on record, is that “airfare in normal circumstances is market-driven and neither established nor regulated.” This made sense in theory. In practice, it created a market where the consumer has no protection during demand shocks.
The Supreme Court’s intervention will likely produce one of three outcomes: a government affidavit that promises a review with no structural change; temporary fare caps on specific routes during designated festival periods; or DGCA empowerment with enforceable authority to penalize exploitative pricing.
The third path is the most consequential and the most complex. Airlines will argue, correctly, that regulation of fares killed Jet Airways and Air Deccan and that capping prices during demand surges will simply cause carriers to reduce supply on those routes. That’s not a theoretical concern; it happened.
The honest answer is that India needs both supply-side fixes (more pilots, more airport capacity, more competition on Tier-2 routes) and demand-side transparency (algorithmic pricing that passengers can understand and predict). Neither is quick. Neither is cheap.
Until then, Holi flight prices in 2026 are what they are: a market clearing mechanism operating in a structurally constrained system during a socially non-negotiable event. The Supreme Court is right to flag it. Whether the government’s response matches the scale of the problem is the question to watch when the March 23 hearing comes around.
Related